rarara wrote:also, and apologies for being completely off topic, i put the n0n0x back on a few days ago to refresh my memory. made me think - has any A/B comparison of the same pattern between n0n0x (or any other OS) and a 303 been performed that you are aware of, to see if the sequencing itself differs? obviously this would only be valid if someone had got their x0x to sound identical to their 303

as far as the sequencer goes, all that really matters is whether it sends the same pitch/gate/accent/slide signals to the synth section
the TB-303 sequencer has a separation between time data and note data
so you can't really program the same patterns on a TB-303 and another clone, without converting the patterns
now, given the x0xb0x, if you convert a TB-303 pattern - the x0xb0x can perfectly reproduce the pitch/gate/accent/slide signals
that's true for stock firmware, sokkos, n0nx0x
the thing is.. with stock firmware and sokkos - you can make patterns which are not possible to make on the 303 sequencer, like, you can have an accent on a rest
n0nx0x has the same separation between time data and note data, like the 303 sequencer, so you don't have to convert anything
if you haven't noticed, c0nb0x has a pattern editor with the same TB-303 pattern notation, and converts the pattern automatically into the x0x format
so you don't have to put n0nx0x just to try out some TB-303 pattern
